Impact of lymphopenia on efficacy of nivolumab in head and neck cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Lymphopenia has been correlated with poorer survival in patients with metastatic cancers treated with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Treatments such as chemotherapy, surgery or radiotherapy can induce lymphopenia. Radiation-induced lymphopenia is common and prolonged in head and neck cancer (HNSCC) patients. We evaluated the impact of lymphopenia, on efficacy of anti PD-1 nivolumab immunotherapy in HNSCC patients. METHODS: a multicenter retrospective study included consecutive patients treated with nivolumab for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HNSCC between January 2017 and June 2019. Lymphopenia was defined as lymphocyte counts below 1000 cells/mm3 upon initiation of nivolumab. Logistical regression was performed on factors associated with lymphopenia and ROC analyses assessed association between lymphopenia and survival. RESULTS: median age was 65. Of the 100 included patients, 60% had been treated by surgery, 67% had had first-line chemotherapy, and 89% loco-regional radiotherapy, 65% had concurrent chemotherapy with radiotherapy. Lymphopenia occurred in 56 (56%) patients upon initiation of nivolumab, with 29 (29%) patients having radiation-related lymphopenia. Prior locoregional radiotherapy was the only factor associated with lymphopenia upon initiation of nivolumab by logistical regression (OR 0.144 [0.029-0.706], p - 0.017). Lymphopenia upon initiation of nivolumab did not affect progression-free survival (PFS) (p - 0.815), overall survival (OS) (p - 0.783) or disease control rate (DCR) (p - 0.125). Locoregional symptomatology (HR - 2.37 [1.24-4.54], p - 0.009), metastatic symptomatology (HR - 4.74 [2.21-10.15], and persistent lymphopenia under nivolumab (HR 3.96 [1.19-13.17] p - 0.034) were associated with poorer OS in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphopenia upon initiation of nivolumab was not associated with poorer survival in R/M HNSCC patients, but persistence of lymphopenia during immunotherapy might be a prognostic marker of patient survival.

Impact of Early Supportive Care Assessment on treatment decision in head and neck cancer before concomitant chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a global pretherapeutic comprehensive supportive care assessment performed in an outpatient supportive care clinic (OSCC) and early supportive care interventions on oncological treatment choice in patients with chemoradiation (CRT) indication for head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: In this monocentric prospective observational study, we included all patients considered for CRT (exclusive or post-operative) for HNC from February 2019 to March 2020. The following frailty indicators were assessed: comorbidities (Charlson index), nutritional status, altered functional ability (ADL and IADL), social precarity (EPICES score), cognitive impairment (MoCA score), addictive habits and pain. RESULTS: OSCC led to a change in treatment for 13.7% of patients, mainly de-escalations. Ninety-three percent of patients had at least one altered domain, including 50% with three or more altered domains. Cognitive function was the most frequently altered domain (66.7%). Altered functional ability was significantly associated with treatment de-escalation after OSCC. Treatment interruptions were significantly associated with treatment de-escalation and social precarity. De-escalation was also associated with a significantly poorer PFS (median of 23.2 mos. vs 8.8 mos., HR = 2.18 95%IC[1.02-4.63] p = 0.037)) and a non-significant trend towards worse OS (median 23.3mos. vs not reached (HR = 2.16 95%CI[0.88-5.31] p = 0.0836). CONCLUSION: We strongly encourage the creation of OSCC for patients treated with chemoradiation for HNC. This practice, through an exhaustive assessment, favours therapeutic adaptation, personalized follow-up and optimization of supportive care.

Impact of previous nivolumab treatment on the response to taxanes in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are widely used in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). We aimed to describe response rates to taxanes after progression on nivolumab in R/M HNSCC patients. METHODS: In this multicentric retrospective comparative study, we included patients treated with taxane monotherapy from 2014 to 2020. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they received nivolumab before taxanes (post-nivolumab group) or not (control group). The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR) comparison between the two groups. The secondary end-points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and PFS ratio (PFSr=PFS associated with taxanes divided by PFS associated with the previous line of treatment), a survival marker used for comparison of different treatment lines. RESULTS: Between July 2014 and August 2020, 185 patients were included (114 in the control group and 71 in the post-nivolumab group). ORR was significantly higher in the post-nivolumab group (39.4% versus 26.3%, p = 0.03) as was DCR (69% versus 50%, P = 0.06). The median OS (7.5 months) and PFS (3.5 months) were not significantly different in the two groups, whereas PFSr was significantly improved in the post-nivolumab group (1.63 versus 1.11, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Response and DCRs with taxanes are improved after prior exposure to nivolumab. Thus, taxane monotherapy could be a good choice as third-line therapy after nivolumab following a platinum-based first line. These results currently apply to patients without access to or potential benefit from first-line pembrolizumab.

Platinum-induced nausea and vomiting in patients treated for head and neck cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Swallowing difficulties in patients with advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) represent an obstacle to adequate antiemetic prophylaxis before chemotherapy. We aim to assess chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) risk in HNC patients in our center, with a specific focus among patients who could not receive appropriate NK1 receptor antagonist (NK1-RA) prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective observational monocentric study. CINV were evaluated with the MASCC Antiemesis Tool self-questionnaire (MAT) for all patients treated by platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced HNC (January-April 2019), thereafter, only for patients without NK1-RA prophylaxis due to swallowing difficulties were included (May-October 2019). RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included (82% male, 49.2% reccurent/metastatic disease), 18 did not received NK1-RA prophylaxis due to swallowing difficulties. Among 52 patients included from January to April 2019, 17.3% reported swallowing difficulties. The chemotherapy regimen was highly and moderately emetic for 40 (65.6%) and 21 patients (34.4%), respectively. CINV was associated with both cisplatin-based chemotherapy (OR 10.66, 95% CI [2.17-52.08]) and exclusive chemotherapy (OR 7.76, 95% CI [1.79-33.78]). Patients who did not receive anti-NK1 prophylaxis had no more CINV than patients with adequate CINV prophylaxis. DISCUSSION: CINV remains frequent in patients treated by platinum-based chemotherapy for HNC. Oral NK1-RA prophylaxis can be unavailable because of swallowing difficulties, without an increased risk of CINV.

[Mechanisms of radiation-induced lymphopenia and therapeutic impact]. / Mécanismes de la lymphopénie radio-induite et implications thérapeutiques.

Radiation induced lymphopenia is frequent and can be severe and durable. Although lymphocytes have long been known as highly radiosensitive cells, it is poorly characterized. Radiation-induced lymphopenia seems to affect lymphocyte subpopulations differently and seems to be influenced by radiation modalities. The depth and duration of lymphopenia depend on the location of the irradiation and the volumes of treatment. Importantly, radiation-induced lymphopenia has been associated with poorer prognosis in several tumor types. The knowledge about radiation-induced lymphopenia might lead to a rethinking of the modalities of radiotherapy and new approaches to restore lymphocytes counts.

A supportive care dedicated hospitalization ward in comprehensive cancer center.

INTRODUCTION: Supportive care development has created new needs in patients' care pathway. In order to anticipate, evaluate, and take care of patients' needs, a supportive care dedicated hospitalization ward was created in late 2016 in our comprehensive cancer center, including 15 beds (11 for week care and 4 for day care). We aimed to assess the activity of this supportive care ward in 2018. METHODS: Data were extracted from weekly activity reports of supportive care ward and retrospectively analyzed. Those reports are automatically generated from hospitalization scheduling software. RESULTS: In week care ward, 627 stays were recorded. Occupancy rate was 88%. Mean stay duration was 3.01 days. Main indications for week stay were pain evaluation and management (47.4%) and nutritional management (31.7%). In day care ward, 1191 stays were registered. Turnover rate was 1.18 patients/bed/day. Main indications for day stay were pain management (41.6%) and comprehensive geriatric assessment in oncology (22.8%). CONCLUSION: The 2018 supportive care ward evaluation showed its viability in comprehensive cancer center. The main activity was based on pain and nutritional management.

[Systemic treatments of metastatic or locally recurrent adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck, a systematic review]. / Traitements systémiques du carcinome adénoïde kystique de la sphère ORL localement avancé ou métastatique, une revue systématique.

INTRODUCTION: Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma is a rare tumor of the head and neck sphere. The purpose of this review is a state of the art of systemic treatments (chemotherapies, targeted therapies, immunotherapies) for locally recurrent or metastatic disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our inclusion criteria included head and neck adult patient, metastatic or locally advanced, treated by a systemic therapy, and with at least 10 or more patients. RESULTS: Forty articles have been selected in this review. The objective response rate under chemotherapy was predominantly<10% (0-70%) with objective responses in monotherapy with cisplatin, mitoxantrone, vinorelbine and eribuline, and with cisplatin-vinorelbine combination. EGFR inhibitors provided 40% objective responses only in combination. Inhibitors of VEGF and histone deacetylase have allowed disease stabilization in progressive patients, with about 10% of objective response. Inhibitors of c-KIT monotherapy yield objective response rates of<5%. Direct inhibitors of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway display 0% objective response rate. CONCLUSION: The best objective response rates were obtained with cisplatin-vinorelbine combination. Many targetable molecular abnormalities have been identified and studies have shown prolonged stabilization with EGFR, VEGF and HDAC inhibitors. Multi-disciplinary collaborative consultation (MCC) meetings such as French network of experts in rare head and neck tumors (REFCOR) or Molecular MCC should be proposed and may allow referral to centers proposing specific therapeutic trials.

Prospective comparison of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) in geriatric oncology.

INTRODUCTION: Among the various instruments recommended by the International Society of Geriatric Oncology, the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the most commonly used cognitive screening test before oncological treatment. Although the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has been shown to be more sensitive than the MMSE in several pathologies, no specific data exist for older patients with cancer. We aimed to compare the proportions of older patients with cancer who had screened positive for cognitive impairment according to the MMSE and MoCA scores obtained during a pretherapeutic geriatric assessment (GA) in oncology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted among 66 patients older than 70 years who were candidates for a first-line treatment for either a solid tumor or hematological malignancy. Patients with brain tumor or previously known dementia were ineligible. During GA, cognitive function was assessed using both the MoCA and the MMSE tests administered in a random order. RESULTS: Median age was 78 years. Most patients (n = 43, 65.2%) had a solid tumor. The median scores were 26 [11-30] for MMSE and 24 [8-30] for MoCA. Thirteen (19.7%) and 44 (66.7%) patients were screened positive for cognitive impairment according to MMSE and MoCA scores, respectively. Overall, 55 (66.7%) patients were screened positive: 12 (21.8%) on both scores, 32 (70.5%) with the MoCA only, and one patient with MMSE only (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The MoCA test seems to be most relevant to screen for cognitive impairment in older patients with cancer.

Retrospective evaluation of concomitant cetuximab and radiotherapy tolerance for locoregional advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treatment in patients unfit for platinum-based chemotherapy.

Radiotherapy associated with cetuximab (Cet-RT) is an alternative treatment to platinum-based chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (LAHNC). Reviews suggest that the use of cetuximab is associated with poorer tolerance in patients unfit for chemotherapy than in pivotal trial. We retrospectively studied patients first treated by Cet-RT for LAHNC presenting contraindications to chemoradiotherapy. Objectives were treated population description, acute tolerance, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and 3-month clinical response. Eighty-eight patients were included. Treatment was completed without delay for 43 patients. Grade 3-4 acute toxicity was described in 44.3%: mucositis (n = 20), radiodermatitis (n = 25) folliculitis (n = 10), and anaphylaxis (n = 6). Fourteen patients died during treatment. Median PFS and OS were 6.3 and 18.7 months, respectively. We confirm that Cet-RT tolerance in unfit patients is poorer than that in trials. Survival data illustrate patients' frailty and suggest that balanced use of Cet-RT is required in this population.